Vyrp The government s war on free speech: Protest laws undermine the First Amendment
漏 Sean K 鈥?stock.adobe Dear EarthTalk: Is switching out meat for edible bugs to satisfy our protein needs a viable way to ratchet down our carbon emissions and overall environmental impact 聽聽 <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.it>stanley thermos</a> 聽聽聽聽聽 鈥?J. Cruz., Gary, INIts true that humans affinity for meat鈥攅specially beef, lamb, pork and to a lesser extent chicken鈥攖akes a huge toll on the environment given the resources and emissions expended to rear and then transport it to market. In fact, the UNs Food Agriculture Organization FAO reports that raising livestock accounts for some 18 percent of all greenhouse gas emissions globally. Meanwhile, on the consumption side, cutting meat out of our diets is perhaps the most efficient way we can slash our personal carbon footpr <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.fr>stanley france</a> ints. But eating only vegetables can make it hard to get enough protein, and thats where bugs鈥攚ith half or more of their body weight consisting of proteins鈥攃ould play an important role <a href=https://www.stanleymug.us>stanley cup</a> in providing us with enough sustenance to feed ourselves, especially as our population surges to nine billion by 2050.Proponents of eating bugs argue that emissions from so-called insect farming 鈥攖hat is, growing bugs for the express purpose of feeding humans and/or animals with them鈥攊s a much more energy- and emissions-efficient way to produce protein than traditional forms of livestock agriculture. If we bartered beef, pork or chicken for a handful of insects, the environmental impact of our animal-protein intake would drop dramatically, says Canadian environmentalist Da Igji Moncrief mashes Squirrels to series sweep
By Tricia EricksonAlbert Einstein defined the definition of insanity as doing the same thing over again, expecting different results.While a major percentage of Americans, including me, lament that Obama is our President, will we fulfill the definition of insanity by propping up Mitt Romney, yet again, to lose another election Or will we learn from our Karl Rove mistakes and place a solid and sane leader into The Office Of The Presidency in 2016 On Friday, Mitt Romney finally told the truth about his interest in a third presidential run to a room full of Republican donors, as if he hadnt planned for this all along.While Romney has denied over the past years that he would run for President again, his actions have shown differently.聽 One of Mitts strategies to win 2012 was to spend time and money to prop up GOP candidates to <a href=https://www.stanleyuk.co.uk>stanley mug</a> win elections all over the US. By donating to the GOP candidates, he would in return expect them <a href=https://www.cup-stanley-cup.de>stanley deutschland</a> to support <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.pl>bidon stanley</a> him in his run for the White House. Well, true to Mitt Romney form, he has been using this same tactic, yet again, to gain payback if and / or when he runs for the Presidency a second time. He keeps the right hand working while his left hand stealthily labors behind the scenes. And remember that while Mitt was saying he would not run again, his wife, Ann, did not鈥?until she will again. If Mitt runs again, he will most likely say that his wife, Ann, and children and grandchildren urged him to run again. And who could turn that picture perfect family
