Oxtp U.S. could default as soon as July if the debt limit isn t addressed, Congressional Budget Office report says
Thre <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.com.de>stanley shop</a> e top Senate Democrats have a draft plan to end the federal ban on cannabis and implement a series of programs to help communities that have been harmed by the war on drugs, which have disproportionately tended to be communities of color. Senators Chuck Schumer, the majority leader, Ron Wyden of Oregon and Cory Booker of New Jersey announced the reforms early Wednesday. The reforms come as the public has increasingly supported marijuana legalization over the past few years. This is monumental because at long last we are taking steps in the Senate to right the wrongs of the failed war on drugs, Schumer said at a news confe <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.pl>stanley polska</a> rence Wednesday. Under their plan, states would be able to write their own cannabis laws and marijuana would be eliminated from the federal list of controlled substances within 60 days of implementation. The bill would shift the regulatory jurisdiction from the Drug Enforcement Agency to the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, the Food and Drug Administration and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. Cannabis prohibition, a key pillar of the failed War on Drugs, has caused substantial harm to our communities and small businesses, and especially for communities of color, Wyden said. It s as simple as this: Senators Booker, Schumer and I want to bring common sense to the federal government, end prohibition and restore the lives o <a href=https://www.stanley-mugs.us>stanley water bottle</a> f those hurt most and set them up for opportunity. Cur Nlgb Congress Overrides Bush Veto On Farm Bill
WATER S EDGE....Over at American Footprints, Haggai has a comment about President Bush s speech to the Knesset on Thursday:While it might be true that Bush just took the basically unprecedented step of lashing out at his domestic political opponents in a speech to a foreign parliament, why does it matter where he made the speech Why should we care about that particular aspect of it Let s surmise this scenario: Obama becomes president and ends up in the circumstance of visiting Israel to advance negotiations on a peace agreement, while simultaneously drawing down American forces from Iraq. Let s say he gives a speech there talking about both of those things, and he <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.com.de>stanley becher</a> argues for why American withdrawal from <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.com.de>stanley kaffeebecher</a> Iraq is better for Israel than the policies of the previous administration, including an argument about why invad <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.fr>stanley thermos</a> ing Iraq in the first place was not beneficial to America or to Israel. Surely Republicans would cry foul about the U.S. president slamming his domestic opposition on foreign soil, but would any of us liberals be against it I sure wouldn t be.I think this business about politics stopping at the water s edge has always been overblown, honored more in the breach than the observance. Regardless, though, I agree with Haggai: if this rule ever made sense, it doesn t anymore. Travel is too ubiquitous, television and the internet are too global, and audiences are too sophisticated for this to matter much anymore. Everyone in the world already knows how Bush and Obam