Gzmp McCain Takes Aim At Obama s Character
TOPEKA, Kan. -- A Kansas judge on Thursday blocked the state s first-in-the-nation ban on an abortion procedure that opponents describe as dismembering a fetus, concluding that it would likely present too big an obstacle for women seeking to end their pregnancies.Shawnee County District Court Judge Larry Hendricks ruled in a lawsuit filed this month by the New York-based Center for Reproductive Rights. The center, representing two Kansas abortion providers, argued that the law would force women to undergo riskier procedures or forgo abortions.The center noted that the procedure is used in 95 percent of s <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.us>stanley website</a> econd-trimester abortions nationally, and said previous U.S. Supreme Court rulings don t allow a state to ban the most common method for terminating a pregnancy. <a href=https://www.stanley-mugs.us>stanley thermos mug</a> Hendricks said those arguments were likely to prevail, even though alternative abortion methods still would be legal. The alternatives do not appear to be medically necessary or rea <a href=https://www.stanleycups.at>stanley cup</a> sonable, Hendricks said from the bench. The judge s order will stay in effect while he considers the lawsuit further. The new law was supposed to take effect July 1.It was model legislation from the National Right to Life Committee. Kansas was the first state to enact it. Oklahoma legislators approved a similar measure shortly after Kansas, but that statute takes effect in November. I think that ultimately, we re going to be successful, Jessie Basgall, attorney for Kansans for Life, said after Wulw Student Fee Hike Protest In Sacramento Draws 1,000
QUESTIONING GOODLING....Dahlia Lithwick, in the process of reaming Democratic members of the House judiciary committee for <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.uk>stanley water bottle</a> doing a lousy job of questioning Monica Goodling, mentions something I hadn t noticed in yesterday s reports:<Goodling> tells Brad Sherman, D-Calif., that she looked at Web sites detailing the political contributions made by applicants for assistant U.S. attorney positions, and that she <a href=https://www.cup-stanley.co.uk>stanley thermos mug</a> felt she could take account of political consider <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.uk>stanley cups uk</a> ations in evaluating immigration judges. Kyle Sampson told her that was OK. She tells the committee that she didn t give one job candidate a position, adding, I didn t know she was a Democrat. But I had heard she was a liberal. The committee, however, seems to miss all this. Indeed, they are so delighted when she points fingers at Sampson and McNulty, they don t remember to ask what precisely Sampson and McNulty did.Goodling looked up the political contribution history of applicants for career civil service positions That s interesting, isn t it I wonder if anyone else did that. Seems like this is something that deserved some followup.Which it didn t get, of course. I know that politicians are in love with their own voices, but it never ceases to amaze me that they insist on questioning witnesses like Goodling themselves. For starters, most of them are no good at it. For finishers, Perry Mason himself would have a hard time making headway if he were limited to five-minute bursts. Instead, why not block off a cou