Sgtr Is my autism a superpower
Levels of self-harm in prisons have hit a new high, with more than 60,000 incidents in a year, official figures show.The number of self-harm incidents was up 16% to 61,461 in the 12 months to September 2019, when there were 53,076, according to da <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.es>vaso stanley</a> ta released by the Ministry of Justice MoJ .Prison reform campaigners have criticised the government for failing to respond effectively to serious mental health problems and called Thursdays figures a national scan <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.fr>stanley france</a> dal .According to the MoJs statistics, the number of prisoners self-harming increased by 2% in the latest 12 months, to the highest recorded figure of 12,740 individuals. The number of self-harm incidents per individual rose by 14% from 4.2 to 4.8.Self-harm on the rise in prisonsSeparate figures also published on Thursday showed the number of self-harm incidents in youth custody rose by 3% to 1,841 in the year to March.The latest figures show that the number of deaths in prison fell by 8% in the 12 months to December, down to 300 from 325 in the previous period. Of these, 84 were self-inflicted, a 9% drop from 92 in the previous period.The number of assaults dropped for the first time in six years, reducing by 2% in the year to September to 33,222. Attacks on prison staff remained at similar levels to the previous period, but the 10,059 assaults recorded is still a record level, rising from 2,937 recorded incidents in 2010.Deborah Coles, the director of the charity Inquest, said: Despite i <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.fr>stanley quencher</a> nvestment and scrutiny, the hist Vxsz Why ID card plans are likely to pass this time
Th <a href=https://www.mugs-stanley.us>stanley quencher</a> ree former Labour MPs facing criminal charges over their expenses today lost their final appeal an <a href=https://www.stanleycups.pl>stanley kubek</a> d are now certain to face trial.The supreme court has dismissed claims made by David Chaytor, Elliot Morley and Jim Devine that they should not be tried in a criminal court because their expenses are covered by parlia <a href=https://www.cup-stanley-cup.uk>stanley travel mug</a> mentary privilege and are therefore not subject to criminal laws.All three deny theft by false accounting over their parliamentary expenses and their legal team has argued that the investigation and any sanctions should should lie within the hands of parliament .The supreme court 鈥?the highest court in the UK 鈥?ruled they were not protected by parliamentary privilege. They will now face separate trials at London s Southwark crown court, the first of which is due to begin on 22 November. If found guilty of theft by false accounting, all three could face a maximum sentence of seven years in prison.Nine justices fast-tracked their decision today to avoid overlapping with the criminal proceedings and will give their reasons for the ruling at a later date. The high court previously dismissed the complaint, saying that parliamentary privilege was never supposed to apply to ordinary alleged crimes. Instead the 302-year old law was designed to encourage free debate in parliament by freeing MPs of anti-slander laws and those governing contempt of court.Nigel Pleming QC, representing Chaytor and Devine, told a hearing at the supreme court in October th